IntroductionDuring the year 2000. two significant pollution waves coming from Romania went along the Tisza and on some courses of its water regime causing tremendous damages in the ecosystem of the Tisza valley, and to the people living here both from economic and mental point of view. Though the two pollutions are common in being in connection with mining, or rather with irresponsible management and ignoring basic environment protection and safety consequences, big differences can be observed in character, measure and effect of the pollutions.
|
In the period of pollution samplings have been made to record the degree of the pollution, and after the pollution the survey of the measure of death on the given course has been started.
Beside this water conservancy directorates tried to lessen the degree of the damage to be expected by water ruling operations.
|
Since we have made no samplings either during or after the pollutions, therefore we abstain extendingly from independent evaluation of the data. In the followings data of the pollution and main tendency of their downflow are shown by the available data of environment protection inspectorates, and of the Ministry of Environment Protection and certain researchers and research institutes. Evaluations of the effects of pollutions are also described by data available for us.
|
Mortality was 100% within the Csenger section of the Szamos in 2. February between 10:00 and 18:35 hours. Total mortality could be observed at Tunyogmatolcs between 10:00 and 14:30, at Olcsvaapáti between 2. February 14:00 and 3. February 9:15 hours, following the downflow of the contamination wave.
|
Mortality rate of microscopic organizms in the Vásárosnamény section of the Tisza in 2. February was 10%, at Lónya between 2. and 4. February it was 0-80%, within the same period at Záhony it was 20-90%, between 4. and 9. February at Tuzsér it was 15-80%, between 4. and 6. February at Dombrád it was 30-60% and between 4. and 8. February it varied between 10 and 40%.
|
During the ecotoxicological investigations according to the small crustacean (Daphnia sp.) test between 1. and 7. February "very strong" and "strong" toxic effect could be registered, (that is test animals died within few hours), while in the following period - between 0.001 and 0.003 mg/l concentrations - water was proved "medium", and "low" toxic.
Guppis used for the fish test proved more resistant, "very high" and "high" toxic effects have been proved by concentration values above 1.5 mg/l. This condition lasted in the Szamos till 7. February. Plant germination test was much less sensitive to the pollution, it has shown "strong inhibiting" and "inhibiting" effect on growth only in case of the highest cyanide concentrations. This condition lasted on the Szamos between 1. and 3. February. Concentrations below 5 mg/l showed "slight inhibiting" effect, or they proved ineffective. In consequence of dilution in the Tisza "very strong" toxic effect seemed only between 2. and 4. February according to the small crustacean test. At lower sampling points between 3. and 6. February both by small crustacean and fish tests "very strong" and "strong" toxic effect have been appeared.
|
Results of ecotoxicological tests are given by changes ensued in test animals during a 48 hours period. According to these:
1. Water is objectionable, if more than 20% of experimental animals die during the examination period; 2. Water is toxic, if more than 50% of experimental animals die during the examination period. As a function of the exposition period toxicity is classified according to the followings: A. Water is very highly toxic, if more than 50% of test animals die during 1 hour; B. Water is highly toxic, if more than 50% of test animals die during 4 hours; C. Water is medium toxic, if more than 50% of test animals die during 24 hours; D. Water is slightly toxic, if more than 50% of test animals die during 48 hours;
|
Here we have to speak about the work of the Middle-Tisza-Region Water Conservancy Directorate too. Befor the arrival of the pollution they have retained more millions m3 water, so with the help of it contamination could be further diluted. The other important result was, that rised water level did not permit contaminated water to get out from the main bed, so plant and animal life of the Tisza Lake has damaged only in 3-5 % according to examination data.
|
Considerable works have been made in order to keep the drinking water of Szolnok clear, in consequence of which an adequate quality of drinking water could be provided in the period of the pollution too. Beside all these in the period of 2 mg/l cyanide contamination (between 1:00 and 8:00 in 9. February) by the order of the Disaster Prevention Operative Committee no water have been taken from the Tisza.
|
It is worthy of attention, that ecotoxicological test showed total mortality even on the lowermost course of the Tisza both in fisg and small crustacean organizms in the period of peak concentrations. Results of all tests made after the pollution wave passed down were negative.
|
Metal-cyanide complexes, amounting a considerable part of the pollution, dissolving well in water, and beside the chemical composition commonly characteristic to surface waters, they are stable, thereofre they persist unchanged in the water for a longer time. Thanks to this, both cyanide and connecting heavy metals practically left the territory of Hungary in all quantity, they did not accumulate in the sediment. Thanks to water level, the contamination did not touch aquatic habitats of the forebank, and investigation of the nearby wells proved, that pollution did not appear in ground water. In consequence of evaporation, free cyanide content has left the system before it could reach the Middle-Tisza section. By the evidence of material balance difficultly computable because of variable water outputs, characteristic amount of total cyanide on the Hungarian course of the Tisza in the measuring sections was about 100-200 tons.
|
Results of biological investigations made by the Environment Protection Inspectorate show the following image. Algal flora of the water was characteristic to the flood season with low numbers of individuals. Fish death could not be observed in the section. Ecotoxicological investigations showed no toxic effect in either case. These results were characteristic to the whole Hungarian course of the Tisza.
|
Towards the lower section heavy metal content shiwed a decreasing trend, so at Tokaj the peak value of lead concentration has reduced to 0.34 mg/l, that of copper to 0.18 mg/l; at Tiszalök the maximum of lead was 0,34 mg/l, that of zinc was 0.74 mg/l and that of copper was 0.16 mg/l. Increase of the value of floating material was probably the result of the flood (Tokaj 1700 mg/l, Tiszalök 1900 mg/l). At Szolnok as an effect of dammings both floating material content (910 mg/l), and heavy metal content decreased considerably, regarding both maximum values and averages too. (maximum concentrations: lead 0.23 mg/l, zinc 0.44 mg/l, copper 0.22 mg/l). The parameters of all three metals, however, exceeded the limit of heavily polluted water quality class still here. At the Csongrág and the southernmost sampling point, however, heavy metal concentrations remained below these limits. At CSongrág the maximum concentration of lead was 0.19 mg/l, that of zinc at the same place was 0.36 mg/l, while at Tiszasziget the maximum of lead concentration was 0.046 mg/l, and that of zinc was 0.26 mg/l. (Total copper data of the last two sections are not available for us.) Beside the diluting effect of the tributaries decrease of concentration of polluting materials was strengthened by deposition too, this well can be seen from the measure of decreasing certain heavy metal concentrations. According to these, lead with greatest specific density sedimented to the highest degree. First contamination wave has left the territory of Hungary in 19. March.
|